Madariaga - College of Europe Foundation

Madariaga - College of Europe Foundation
Home Publications
Publications
Réforme de la PAC: la flexibilité, une avancée ou un piège?
6 mars 2014, Bruxelles, 13:00 - 14:30

Le Comité agriculture du Parlement européen a validé l'accord avec le Conseil sur la réforme de la PAC. Le nouveau régime, basé sur la proposition de la Commission de 2011, vise à remanier les paiements en faveur des petits exploitants et des nouveaux états-membres, afin d'encourager un renouvellement générationnel et de rendre cette politique plus verte. Cependant, la réforme fait l'objet de critiques grandissantes car la proposition originelle de la Commission a été diluée pendant les négociations, notamment concernant les aspects redistributionnels et environnementaux. La dégressivité envisagée, inférieure au niveau souhaité par le Parlement, mènera-t-elle à une distribution plus équitable des aides? La PAC est-elle réellement en train de verdir ou, au contraire, les régimes d'exception vont-ils laisser une large partie des terres agricoles en dehors des surfaces d’intérêt écologique, empêchant une diversification significative? La flexibilité introduite entre le Pilier 1 (paiements directs) et le Pilier 2 (développement rural) ne risque-t-elle pas de détourner les ressources utilisées pour la conservation et la durabilité de l'environnement au profit d'un supplément des revenus pour les producteurs alimentaires?    

Une Controverse citoyenne avec Marc Tarabella, Membre du Parlement européen, S&D, et Faustine Defossez, Senior Policy Officer, European Environmental Bureau.  

Le débat était modéré par Pierre Defraigne, Directeur Exécutif de la Fondation Madariaga-Collège d'Europe.

Le débat s'est tenu en français.

 Report

 
China, 1978-2013: from one Plenum to another. Reflections on hopes and constraints for reform in the Xi Jingping era

Professor Eric Florence - University of Liège

Madariaga Paper, Vol. 7, No. 7 (July, 2014)

Why is it so difficult to talk about China in a nuanced and contrasting manner without falling back on superlatives and generalisations? In about thirty years, China’s GDP per capita has multiplied by eight. From a marginal economic power during the Maoist period (1949-1978), China is now ranked tenth in terms of global economic weight. “Wealth and power” (fu qiang) is the expression that embodies China’s quest for modernity since the second half of the 19th century, when China was still under the yoke of the West. This ambition is still at the heart of the “Chinese dream of rejuvenation of the Chinese nation” dear to Xi Jinping, which he set out during the Third Plenum of the 18th Central Committee of the Chinese Communist Party. But focusing only on this vision of “wealth and power” takes us back to one of the most common ways of representing China: reducing the ongoing socio-economic changes and dynamics to a set of numeric values, ultimately reified and homogenised. The increased power and internationalisation of the Chinese economy has prompted a combination of worry and enthusiasm. What does this imply about the paradigm shift in the way we portray this country? Perhaps it is still hard to leave behind the image of a subordinate, poor and voiceless China and consider the Chinese people as, at least, our equals.

  Read the Paper

 
Is Eurosur the Right Response to Lampedusa?
28 April 2014, Brussels, 13:00 - 14:30

Coinciding with the latest in a long series of humanitarian disasters in the Mediterranean, the European Parliament has given the green light to Eurosur, an integrated external border surveillance system combining satellite tracking, drones, intelligence equipment and offshore sensors. The system aims at ensuring better detection of migrant flows by informing the departure countries in real time, preventing smuggling and human trafficking, and improving coordination between different jurisdictions. This is in response to the concerns of Member States who claims to have being "left alone" by Europe in confronting maritime migrant arrivals. However, critical voices argue that the measures focus on issues of border defence rather than rescuing human lives: is Europe breaching its human rights commitments by "externalising" its borders to North African countries which have been repeatedly criticised for their treatment of refugees? Do Eurosur provisions risk giving the same treatment to smugglers, refugees, and asylum-seekers? Should the measures contain explicit reference to rescue operations, or has this the potential to further incentivise migrants to undertake dangerous sea journeys?    

Citizen’s Controversy with Kris Pollet, Senior Legal and Policy Officer at the European Council on Refugees and Exiles, and Oliver Seiffarth, Policy Officer for Eurosur at the DG Home Affairs of the European Commission.  

The debate was moderated by Pierre Defraigne, Executive Director, Madariaga - College of Europe Foundation.

The debate was held in English.

 Report

 
Is Euroscepticism a Blessing?
9 April 2014, Brussels, 13:00 - 14:30

Eurosceptic parties are expected to significantly increase their influence in the next EU Parliament. Despite the lack of uniformity of the anti-Europe parties, who span the political spectrum ranging from the xenophobic and radical right to the anti-establishment movements, the eurosceptic rise is exposing the fault lines of the European response to the crisis. Citizens feel failed by an elite-driven discourse of integration, which according to them is partly responsible for global developments fostering inequalities and weakening the middle class. Is this a step towards institutional paralysis, or is it a sign of healthy democracy? Does this indicate that European citizens are beginning to recognise the EU as a political space influencing their lives, or do elections not leading to government formation necessarily become an occasion to vent issue-specific grievances rather than selecting between different political projects? Will the growing eurosceptic success drive pro-EU parties towards a cartel replacing the left-right divide and therefore alienating citizens even more, or will it be the chance for the pro-EU movement to finally politicise European discourse?  

Citizen’s Controversy with Thomas Klau, Senior Policy Fellow, European Council for Foreign Relations, and Mats Persson, Director of Open Europe.  

The debate was moderated by Pierre Defraigne, Executive Director, Madariaga - College of Europe Foundation.

The debate was held in English.

 Report

 
Eurozone sovereign debt restructuring is unavoidable

Professor John Ryan - Von Hügel Institute, St. Edmund's College.  University of Cambridge

Madariaga Paper, Vol. 7, No. 5 (June, 2014)

Most EU officials and most government officials of eurozone countries officially reject any suggestion of a restructuring of the debt of Greece or Ireland. Rising financial exposure to the troubled countries will raise political resistance against further financial help in the countries granting the assistance, and continuing pressure for ever more austerity demanded in return for external assistance will raise political opposition against adjustment policies in the troubled countries themselves. In the end, this leaves only one route open. Political populist opposition as seen by the recent European Parliament elections has already gathered momentum in creditor and debtor nations and will enforce an end to either austerity or financial assistance and will thus trigger a debt restructuring.

  Read the Paper

 
  • «
  •  Start 
  •  Prev 
  •  1 
  •  2 
  •  3 
  •  4 
  •  5 
  •  6 
  •  7 
  •  8 
  •  9 
  •  10 
  •  Next 
  •  End 
  • »


Page 1 of 54

Copyright

© 2008 Madariaga College of Europe Foundation. All rights reserved.

Address

Avenue de la Joyeuse Entrée, 14/2
1040 Brussels
Belgium

Contact us

Tel: +32 2 209 62 10
Fax:
+32 2 209 62 11
E-Mail: info@madariaga.org

Credits

artcreative

W3C: XHTML | CSS | WAI-AA